بررسی نقش طراحی بسته‌بندی در حفظ و احیای صنایع دستی گیلان و افزایش ارزش افزوده سوغات سفر

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسنده

استادیار گروه جغرافیا و برنامه‌ریزی شهری، دانشکدۀ ادبیات و علوم انسانی، دانشگاه گیلان، رشت، ایران

چکیده

صنایع‌دستی و سوغات محلی گیلان به‌عنوان بخشی از میراث فرهنگی و اقتصادی این استان، نیازمند توجه و حمایت هستند. از آنجا که بسته‌بندی به‌عنوان یکی از عناصر کلیدی در بازاریابی و فروش محصولات به‌شمار می‌رود، طراحی بسته‌بندی به‌عنوان یک ابزار قدرتمند، می‌تواند در حفظ و احیای این صنایع و افزایش ارزش افزوده محصولات نقش به‌سزایی ایفا کند. این پژوهش با هدف بررسی تأثیر طراحی بسته‌بندی بر حفظ صنایع‌دستی و افزایش جذابیت سوغات گیلان انجام شده است. روش تحقیق از نوع توصیفی ـ تحلیلی و مبتنی‌بر ترکیب رویکردهای کیفی و کمّی است. داده‌ها از طریق مطالعات کتابخانه‌ای و مصاحبه‌های نیمه‌ساختاریافته با صنعتگران، فروشندگان و گردشگران جمع‌آوری شده است. بر اساس تحلیل نظریه بنیانی، چالش‌های بسته‌بندی مانند هزینه‌های بالا و کمبود مواد اولیه، مانع از رقابت‌پذیری محصولات شده، اما بسته‌بندی مناسب می‌تواند ارزش افزوده محصولات را افزایش داده و به احیای صنایع‌دستی منطقه کمک کند. تحلیل آماری داده‌های مصاحبه‌شدگان نشان می‌دهد که گردشگران بیشترین اهمیت را به بسته‌بندی می‌دهند (میانگین امتیاز 4/7 از 5)، درحالی‌که صنعتگران به‌دلیل محدودیت‌های مالی کمتر بر این موضوع تمرکز دارند. مشکلات اصلی بسته‌بندی شامل هزینه‌های بالا (۳۵٪)، کمبود مواد اولیه (۲۵٪) و عدم آگاهی از طراحی بهینه (۲۰٪) است. از سوی دیگر، گردشگران، استحکام، زیبایی بصری و اطلاعات محصول را به‌عنوان مهم‌ترین ویژگی‌های بسته‌بندی ترجیح می‌دهند. همچنین، ۷۰٪ از فروشندگان افزایش فروش را به بسته‌بندی جذاب نسبت داده و ۴۸٪ تأثیر آن را بر افزایش قیمت محصول تأیید کرده‌اند. نتایج نشان می‌دهد که طراحی بسته‌بندی با استفاده از نمادهای الهام‌گرفته از فرهنگ بومی، مواد بوم‌آورد و فناوری‌های نوین، نه‌تنها به حفظ هویت فرهنگی کمک می‌کند، بلکه می‌تواند به‌عنوان یک ابزار بازاریابی مؤثر و تعاملی، ارزش افزوده محصولات را افزایش دهد و این‌چنین، زنجیره اقتصادی گردشگری گیلان را بیش از پیش شکوفا سازد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله [English]

The Role of Packaging Design in Preserving and Revitalizing Gilan’s Handicrafts and Increasing the Added Value of Travel Souvenirs

نویسنده [English]

  • Hamideh Beigi
Assistant Professor, Geography and Urban Planning Department, Literature and Humanities Faculty, University of Guilan, Rasht, Iran
چکیده [English]

Background: Handicrafts and traditional souvenirs are vital expressions of regional identity and heritage, embodying the cultural memory and economic resilience of local communities. In Iran’s Gilan province—a region renowned for its rich traditions in weaving, pottery, woodwork, and culinary crafts—these art forms serve as both tangible connections to the past and as economic assets in tourism-driven development. However, despite their intrinsic value, the survival of these crafts is increasingly threatened by market saturation, diminished cultural visibility, and outdated marketing strategies. Among these, the role of packaging is often neglected, although it significantly influences consumer decisions, especially in competitive markets. Packaging not only protects the physical integrity of products but also enhances their visual appeal and communicates their cultural significance to diverse audiences. Internationally, packaging is a strategic tool for brand representation and cultural transmission (Kotler & Keller, 2016). It also contributes to product differentiation in tourism economies, where consumers often make emotional, rather than utilitarian, purchasing decisions (Wu, 2020). In Gilan, however, packaging for handicrafts and local souvenirs remains largely underdeveloped—limited by high costs, inadequate materials, and insufficient design expertise. Consequently, these products often fail to capture the attention of tourists who increasingly seek unique, aesthetically pleasing, and sustainable items that carry cultural depth. Studies such as Dawood and El-Din (2019) and Dong (2018) underscore the value of culturally meaningful packaging in enriching tourist experiences and strengthening destination branding. In this context, there is an urgent need for an integrated packaging strategy that can connect Gilan’s rich cultural heritage with modern consumer expectations.
Objectives: This study aims to investigate the multifaceted role of packaging design in preserving and revitalizing Gilan’s traditional handicrafts and enhancing their value as tourism commodities. It specifically explores how packaging influences buyer perceptions and behavior, especially among domestic and international tourists. Additionally, the study seeks to identify the expectations of key stakeholders—tourists, artisans, and vendors—regarding packaging aesthetics, functionality, and sustainability. Finally, it proposes a strategic packaging model tailored to Gilan’s local identity and market conditions, integrating elements of cultural symbolism, ecological responsibility, and economic feasibility.
Method: To achieve these objectives, the study adopted a descriptive-analytical methodology based on a mixed-methods approach that combined both qualitative and quantitative techniques. Data collection was carried out in three phases: first, through qualitative methods involving in-depth, semi-structured interviews with 20 artisans, 15 vendors, and 30 tourists to explore their experiences, expectations, and challenges regarding the packaging of local handicrafts; second, using quantitative methods, structured surveys were administered to assess preferences and attitudes toward key packaging attributes such as durability, visual appeal, informational content, and environmental sustainability; and third, through secondary research, a thorough review of relevant literature and comparative analysis of successful international packaging strategies was conducted to establish a conceptual framework. For the qualitative data, Grounded Theory methodology was used, involving open coding to extract primary themes, axial coding to organize these into broader categories, and selective coding to construct a theoretical model linking packaging quality to consumer engagement and market effectiveness. Quantitative data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, including mean scores and frequency distributions, as well as correlation analysis to examine the relationships between packaging design features and consumer behavior within the sample.
Result: Findings from the study yielded several key insights across different dimensions of packaging design and its impact. Among the most significant packaging challenges reported by artisans were high design costs (35%), lack of locally available raw materials (25%), and insufficient knowledge of packaging standards (20%). Vendors also pointed to inconsistencies in visual identity and a lack of sustainable practices as factors that weakened market appeal and discouraged repeat purchases. Tourists demonstrated a strong preference for packaging that offered durability (40%), visual appeal (30%), and informative labeling (16.6%), with an average importance score of 4.7 out of 5, underscoring packaging’s decisive influence on purchase decisions. From an economic perspective, 70% of vendors observed increased sales linked to attractive packaging, while 48% acknowledged that well-designed packaging enabled them to raise product prices, emphasizing the role of design in boosting perceived value and allowing for price flexibility. In response to these findings, a five-pronged strategic packaging model was proposed: (1) cultural grounding, by incorporating traditional symbols such as the Marlik goat, Masuleh architecture, and local textiles like chadorshab and ghalamkar fabrics; (2) sustainability, through the use of recyclable, biodegradable materials and reusable containers like bamboo baskets and fabric wraps; (3) luxury branding, involving premium presentation with woodcraft, Persian calligraphy, and refined aesthetics for export markets; (4) experiential packaging, by integrating sensory features such as scented boxes and QR codes linking to digital storytelling; and (5) accessibility and practicality, with small, lightweight formats that cater to varying tourist needs and budgets. Furthermore, packaging that conveyed the narrative of a product—highlighting its origin, craftsmanship, and cultural significance—was found to foster stronger emotional connections with consumers, significantly increasing both their willingness to purchase and their brand loyalty.
Conclusion: Packaging design, when aligned with cultural values, sustainable practices, and strategic branding, emerges as a powerful lever for revitalizing Gilan’s handicrafts and expanding their appeal in both domestic and international tourism markets. This study emphasizes that packaging is not merely a functional component but a cultural and emotional interface that can redefine consumer engagement with local products. Effective packaging elevates the symbolic value of handicrafts, supports cultural storytelling, and enhances the economic viability of craft-based livelihoods. To implement such strategies, coordinated efforts from local authorities, artisans, design experts, and marketers are required. Educational programs on packaging design, subsidies for sustainable materials, and collaborative branding platforms could further facilitate this transformation. Lessons from global markets, such as Japan and Italy, show that combining traditional aesthetics with modern presentation standards can significantly enhance both brand identity and export capacity. In Gilan, a strategic investment in culturally grounded, experience-driven packaging could strengthen the region’s tourism economy, support craft sustainability, and preserve its unique cultural legacy for future generations.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Handicrafts
  • Gilan
  • Travel Souvenirs
  • Added Value
  • Indigenous Design
Abidin, S. Z., Effendi, R. A. A. R. A., Ibrahim, R., & Idris, M. Z. (2014). A semantic approach in perception for packaging in the SME’s food industries in Malaysia: A case study of Malaysia food product branding in United Kingdom. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 115, 115–130.
Amaro, S., Morgado Ferreira, B., & Henriques, C. (2020). Towards a deeper understanding of the purchase of souvenirs. Tourism and Hospitality Research, 20(2), 223–236.
Arman, E., Ale Ali, F., & Zakerin, M. (2021). Handicrafts as a link between identity and branding in packaging industry. Journal of Iranian Handicrafts Studies, 4(1), 149–156. (In Persian)
Ashari, S., & Shahhoseini, A. (2023). Culture-based design with Stuart Hall representation theory: A case study of craft packaging identification. Rahpooye Honar-Ha-Ye Tajassomi, 6(3), 81–89. (In Persian)
Cai, L. A., Lehto, X. Y., & O’Leary, J. (2001). Profiling the US-bound Chinese travelers by purpose of trip. Journal of Hospitality & Leisure Marketing, 7(4), 3–16.
Cohen, E. (1995). Touristic craft ribbon development in Thailand. Tourism Management, 16(3), 225–235.
Dawood, N. A. E. G., & El-Din, R. M. B. (2019). The role of souvenirs and handicrafts in achieving tourists’ satisfaction. مجلة کلیة السیاحة والفنادق، جامعة المنصورة,. 66-106, (6) 6.
Dong, Y. (2018, May). Research on the innovative packaging design of the tourist souvenirs in regional intangible cultural heritages. In 2018 7th International Conference on Energy, Environment and Sustainable Development (ICEESD 2018) (pp. 177–181). Atlantis Press.
Dumbrovska, V., & Fialova, D. (2019). The city of one hundred souvenir shops: Authenticity of souvenirs in Prague. Journal of Tourism and Cultural Change.
Durie, A., & Kebede, A. (2017). Determinants of tourist satisfaction: Evidence from tourist destination sites in Amhara Region, Ethiopia. Singaporean Journal of Business Economics and Management Studies, 5(8).
Elahi, L. (2023). The role of packaging in motivating consumers to buy Fars ‘Giveh’. Packaging Science and Art, 13(51), 47–55. (In Persian)
Esmaeilpour, M., & Rajabi, A. (2019). Factors affecting consumer perception of reusability of product packaging: Case study – consumers of Bushehr city. Journals of Environmental Education and Sustainable Development, 7(3), 115–126. (In Persian)
Farokhi, S., Namamian, F., Asgharisarem, A., & Ghobadi, T. (2020). Explaining the pattern of visual attention in impulsive purchasing behavior of tourism industry customers by the metasynthesis method. Journal of Tourism and Development, 9(4), 199–214. (In Persian)
 
Garaus, M., & Halkias, G. (2020). One color fits all: Product category color norms and (a) typical package colors. Review of Managerial Science, 14(5), 1077–1099.
Gasana, P. (2009). Relative status and interdependent effects in consumer behavior. Journal of Socio-Economics, 38, 52–59.
Goo, Y., & Shen, M. (2011). The relationship between authenticity and the souvenir purchase intent. Pan-Pacific Management Review, 14(2), 109–129.
Gordon, B. (1986). The souvenir: Messenger of the extraordinary. Journal of Popular Culture, 20(3), 135.
Habibollahi, F. (2019). Handicrafts and the development of cultural heritage tourism. Tehran, Iran: Shafaf Publications. (In Persian)
Jin, C., Yoon, M., & Lee, J. (2019). The influence of brand color identity on brand association and loyalty. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 28(1), 50–62.
Karimipour, Z., & Sharifzade, M. (2018). Cultural-based components in Iran handicraft packaging. Journal Name, 2(1), 67–76. (In Persian)
Kim, H., Lee, J., & Park, S. (2020). Cultural identity in handicraft packaging design: A case study of traditional craft markets. Journal of Design and Culture, 12(3), 210–227.
Kim, S., & Littrell, M. A. (1999). Predicting souvenir purchase intentions. Journal of Travel Research, 38, 153–161.
Kotler, P., & Keller, K. L. (2016). Marketing Management (15th ed.). Pearson.
Li, R. (2023). An integrated group decision-making method for brand packaging design effect evaluation based on the 2-tuple linguistic Pythagorean fuzzy sets. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems, 45(2), 2167–2177.
Liguang, Z., Mingju, L., & Yuqiao, J. (2018, December). Study on the development strategy of tourist souvenirs in Changbai Mountain Nature Reserve. In 4th International Conference on Economics, Management, Law and Education (EMLE 2018) (pp. 307–311). Atlantis Press.
Littrell, M. A., Anderson, L. F., & Brown, P. J. (1993). What makes a craft souvenir authentic? Annals of Tourism Research, 20(1), 197–215.
Marangkun, W., & Thipjumnong, A. (2018). Souvenir product purchasing as a travel motivation in the shopping area of Thale Noi, Phatthalung, Thailand. Journal of Tourism and Hospitality Management, 6(2), 47–60.
Meilani, M. (2014). Pencitraan desain kemasan oleh-oleh Jepang. Humaniora, 5(2), 901–908.
Mogindol, S. H., & Bagul, A. H. B. B. P. (2016). Tourists’ perceptions about an appealing handicraft. Tourism, Leisure and Global Change, 1(1), 10–24.
Morgan, N., & Pritchard, A. (2005). On souvenirs and metonymy: Narratives of memory, metaphor, and materiality. Journal of Tourist Studies, 5(1), 29–53.
Moscardo, G. (2004). Shopping as a destination attraction: An empirical examination of the role of shopping in tourists’ destination choice and experience. Journal of Vacation Marketing, 10(4), 294–311.
Mousavi, S. N., Ghafourian Shagerdi, A., Sereshoumi, A., & Sepahvand, R. (2019). Development of tourism industry through branding of handicrafts. Journal of Tourism and Development, 7(4), 226–240. (In Persian)
Nezampour, M., Rojuee, M., & Daroodi, M. (2022). Content analysis of product packaging design elements of nuts and dried fruits, and study of its relationship with customers’ purchasing decisions (Case study: Narmak Nuts and Dried Fruits). Journal of Packaging Science and Technology, 12(4), 11–25. (In Persian)
Paraskevaidis, P., & Andriotis, K. (2015). Values of souvenirs as commodities. Tourism Management, 48, 1–10.
Penerliev, M. (2017). The souvenir industry as an additional tourist activity. Quaestus, 10, 67.
Qiu, L., Rahman, A. R. A., & Dolah, M. S. B. (2024). The role of souvenirs in enhancing local cultural sustainability: A systematic literature review. Sustainability, 16(10), 3893.
Ramezanzadeh Lasboyee, M., & Zaal, M. H. (2016). Crafts features analysis to develop heritage tourism: An (O.P.C.T.L) model (Case study: Mazandaran province). Spatial Planning, 5(4), 87–102. (In Persian)
Roostika, R., Wahyuningsih, T., & Haryono, S. (2015). The impacts of external competitiveness factors in the handicrafts industry. Polish Journal of Management Studies, 12(1), 166–176.
Schlüter, R. G. (1998). The role of T-shirts in the creation of tourist destination images. Studies and Perspectives in Tourism – Electronic Journal, 1, 7.
Shayestehfar, M. (2014). Packaging and its role in enhancing the quality of handicraft products. Journal of Packaging Science and Technology, 5(19). (In Persian)
Shayestehfar, M., & Khazaei, R. (2015). Packaging issues and the distribution of handicraft products. Journal of Packaging Science and Technology, 5(20).(In Persian)
Silayoi, P., & Speece, M. (2007). The importance of packaging attributes: A conjoint analysis approach. European Journal of Marketing, 41(11/12), 1495–1511.
Singh, M. (2017). Community perspective on role of souvenirs in tourism promotion: A case study of Basholi, Jammu. Journal of Business and Management, 19(11), 28–33.
Smith, J. (2020). Sustainable Packaging: A Guide for Designers. Green Press.
Shtudiner, Z., Klein, G., Zwilling, M., & Kantor, J. (2019). The value of souvenirs: Endowment effect and religion. Annals of Tourism Research, 74, 17–32.
Sthapit, E. (2018). The more the merrier: Souvenir shopping, the absence of choice overload and preferred attributes. Tourism Management Perspectives, 26, 126–134.
Swanson, K. K. (2004). Tourists’ and retailers’ perceptions of souvenirs. Journal of Vacation Marketing, 10(4), 363–377.
Swanson, K. K., & Timothy, D. J. (2012). Souvenirs: Icons of meaning, commercialization and commoditization. Tourism Management, 33(3), 489–499.
Swasty, W., & Mustafa, M. (2023). Using multiple case studies to examine the role of colours in SME food packaging. Wacana Seni Journal of Arts Discourse, 22.
Taghaddosnejad, Z., & Shafia, S. (2023). Strategic report on the assessment of the handicrafts industry and its challenges. Office of Cultural and Educational Studies (Sports, Cultural Heritage, and Tourism Group), Research Center of the Islamic Consultative Assembly. (In Persian)
Thompson, F., Hannam, K., & Petrie, K. (2012). Producing ceramic art works through tourism research. Annals of Tourism Research, 39(1), 336–360.
Trinh, T. T., Ryan, C., & Cave, J. (2014). Souvenir sellers and perceptions of authenticity: The retailers of Hội An, Vietnam. Tourism Management, 45, 275–283.
Wei, W. (2018). Understanding values of souvenir purchase in the contemporary Chinese culture: A case of Shanghai Disney. Journal of Destination Marketing & Management, 10, 36–48.
Williams, S. W. (2002). Tourism Geography. London, UK: Routledge.
Wilkins, H. (2011). Souvenirs: What and why we buy. Journal of Travel Research, 50(3), 239–247.
Wong, I. A., & Wan, Y. K. P. (2013). A systematic approach to scale development in tourist shopping satisfaction: Linking destination attributes and shopping experience. Journal of Travel Research, 52(1), 29–41.
Wu, C. (2020). Research of the design positioning and key elements of tourist souvenir packaging. Lifelong Education, 9(4), 159–161.
Zaryabi, M. (2024). The impact of Islamic Iranian design representation on saffron packaging in the communication process with the audience. Scientific Journal of Packaging Science, 14(4), 13–22. (In Persian)
Zaryabi, M., & Abeddoust, H. (2021). The analysis of the expressive and impressive functions of type in the packaging of Iranian foodstuff (The case study: The selected packages of the annual and biennial Iranian packaging designers). Packaging Science and Art, 12(47), 43–56. (In Persian)
 
دوره 3، شماره 1 - شماره پیاپی 4
بهار و تابستان 1404
اردیبهشت 1404
صفحه 31-62
  • تاریخ دریافت: 13 فروردین 1404
  • تاریخ بازنگری: 31 فروردین 1404
  • تاریخ پذیرش: 13 اردیبهشت 1404
  • تاریخ انتشار: 25 اردیبهشت 1404