Reinterpreting some traditional arts on the edge of Anzali wetland with the approach of evaluating the millennium ecosystem

Dadvar, Abolghasem; Eshghi, Fahimeh

doi:10.22124/ira.2025.29447.1045

Reinterpreting some traditional arts on the edge of Anzali wetland with the approach of evaluating the millennium ecosystem

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

Abolghasem Dadvar ¹
Fahimeh Eshghi ²

¹ Prof. Department of Art Research, Al-Zahra University,Tehran, Iran

² Ph.D. Candidate, Department of Art Research, Al-Zahra University,Tehran,Iran

10.22124/ira.2025.29447.1045

Abstract

Introduction: Art and culture have long been intertwined, and understanding the cultural context is essential for interpreting art. Global environmental studies reveal that protecting natural ecosystems is impossible without recognizing the cultures that have evolved alongside them. Sustainable balance in ecological and social systems is achievable by safeguarding both biodiversity and cultural diversity. The "Millennium Ecosystem Assessment" (2001–2005) laid a scientific foundation for sustainable conservation and use of natural ecosystems, emphasizing the role of cultural ecosystem services. It identified art as an inspiring cultural service. Traditional arts, deeply rooted in culture, customs, and beliefs, require interdisciplinary research to analyze their connection to the environment. Such research can foster better human-environment interactions, enhance cultural understanding, and support environmental conservation. This study explored the intersection of traditional arts and cultural services in preserving Anzali Wetland as a case study.
Background: Previous studies have addressed various aspects of Anzali Wetland and its conservation. Talaei and Daryadel (2015) examined legal challenges to the wetland’s preservation. Eshqi, Afhami, and Danekar (2023) assessed the public perception of the wetland’s cultural services to encourage participation in its protection. Other studies, such as those by Nikfetrat and Beitraf (2016), Norouzi, Monsef, and Nouri (2023), and Moghimi-Nejad et al. (2023), have investigated the role of culture in sustainable architecture, rural development, and the relationship between traditional arts and handicrafts, respectively. Shah-Hosseini and Hajian-Faroshani (2023) conducted a comparative study on basket weaving in Gilan and Hormozgan provinces, while Aghakhani Bijani and Fasharki (2020) analyzed the social functions of rituals in Ferdowsi's Shahnameh. However, no interdisciplinary research has explored the connection between traditional arts and the cultural ecosystem services of natural environments. This study addresses this gap.
Objective: The study aims to raise awareness about the cultural services of Anzali Wetland, one of the most vulnerable ecosystems, to encourage its conservation.
Research Question: How do the traditional arts of the local communities around Anzali Wetland contribute to its conservation?
Methodology: Through library research and examination of rural divisions in Gilan province and maps from Iran’s national statistics portal, 42 villages and one city within a 10-kilometer radius of Anzali Wetland were identified as target settlements. Four types of traditional arts—traditional architecture, basket weaving, Lutka (wooden boat) crafting, and traditional rituals—were selected as cultural services. Questionnaires were distributed to local tourism authorities and village leaders to determine the presence of these arts over the past three years. Data were analyzed descriptively and analytically.
Findings and Discussion: The results revealed that traditional architecture and rituals have disappeared, while Lutka crafting and basket weaving are in decline.
Traditional Architecture: Once a vital part of Guilan’s culture, traditional architecture has faded due to modern construction methods. Incorporating the climate-responsive and structural features of traditional Guilanese architecture into contemporary designs may address this loss. Efforts like showcasing traditional homes in Gilan's Rural and Cultural Heritage Museum have been somewhat effective but insufficient.
Lutka Crafting: This traditional art and industry, once central to transportation and fishing, has nearly vanished. Historically, abundant forest resources provided the raw materials for crafting wooden boats, employing many locals. However, environmental degradation, deforestation, lack of interest from younger generations, urban migration, and the rise of fiberglass boats have led to its decline. Today, only four active craftsmen remain in Bandar Anzali and two in Abkenar village. These artisans continue their craft out of a desire to preserve their ancestral heritage and local culture.
Basket Weaving: This handicraft, which uses locally available natural materials, remains relatively active due to its low cost, simple tools, and suitability for small spaces. It is also a significant source of employment, particularly for women. Financial support for women basket weavers has contributed to the craft’s continuity, but it is now limited to Bandar Anzali and Abkenar. Factors like urbanization and the influx of cheap, imported crafts have reduced its popularity. Recent innovations in basket weaving, however, have opened international markets, generating substantial income.
Traditional Rituals: Traditional rituals have disappeared from the studied settlements. In the past, rituals helped people cope with natural forces they could not control, fostering community resilience. Over time, increased scientific knowledge, societal shifts from traditional to modern lifestyles, and changing perceptions have diminished the significance of rituals. According to Durkheim, rituals play a vital role in reinforcing shared beliefs and practices, which strengthen social cohesion. Reviving traditional rituals can enhance cultural identity, self-esteem, and social pride.
Conclusion: Cultural values, including traditional arts, are integral to sustainable development and ecosystem conservation. In Anzali Wetland, preserving and revitalizing traditional arts such as architecture, basket weaving, and Lutka crafting can enhance public awareness and participation in conservation efforts. Supporting these cultural practices and raising awareness of their environmental significance can foster a deeper connection between local communities and their natural surroundings, ultimately contributing to the sustainable protection of Anzali Wetland.

Keywords

Main Subjects

Interdisciplinary Studies of Art

References

Aghakhani Bijani, M., & Mohammadi Fesharki, M. (2020). Analyzing the social functions of rituals and festivals in Shahnameh based on Emile Durkheim’s theory. Journal of New Literary Studies, 53(3), 25-46. https://doi.org/10.22067/JLS.2020.39339 (In Persian).

Ashoorpour, S. (2008). A look at rain-seeking rituals of Chamcheh-Khatun. Theater, (42 & 43), 24-54. (In Persian).

Bahar, M. (2008). From myth to history (6th ed.). Cheshmeh Publishing. (In Persian).

Bell, C. (1992). Ritual theory, ritual practice. Oxford University Press.

Biglari, F., Nokandeh, G., Naderi-Bani, A., & Hejabri, A. (2019). Man and the sea: A review of thousands of years of human and sea relations in Iran (1st ed.). National Museum of Iran and Ports and Maritime Organization Publications. (In Persian).

Binaye Motlaq, S. (2019). On traditional art in confrontation with modern industry. Kimia-ye Honar, 8(30), 7-15. (In Persian).

Boshra, M., & Taheri, T. (2006). Festivals and rituals of the people of Gilan (Nowruz rituals). Ilia Publications. (In Persian).

Burckhardt, T. (1997). Sacred art: Principles and methods (J. Sattari, Trans., 2nd ed.). Soroush Publications. (In Persian).

Burckhardt, T. (2011). The foundations of Christian art (A. Nasri, Trans., 1st ed.). Hikmat Publications. (In Persian).

Dadvar, A., Gharibpour Shahriyari, N., & Arabnia, F. (2013). An inquiry into tradition and modernism and their impact on handicrafts (1st ed.). Alzahra University Publications. (In Persian).

Daniel, T. C., Muhar, A., Arnberger, A., Aznar, O., Boyd, J. W., Chan, K. M., … & Von Der Dunk, A. (2012). Contributions of cultural services to the ecosystem services agenda. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109(23), 8812-8819. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1114773109

Diba, D., & Yaghini, S. (1993). Analysis of traditional Gilan architecture. Architecture and Urban Planning, 4(24), 6-16. (In Persian).

Durkheim, E. (2017). The elementary forms of religious life (B. Parham, Trans., 6th ed.). Markaz Publications. (In Persian).

Eshqi, F., Efahmi, R., Danekar, A., & Garmayipour, R. (2023). Perception of cultural services in Anzali Lagoon. Environmental Education and Sustainable Development, 12(2), 27-48. https://doi.org/10.30473/EE.2023.65533.2568 (In Persian).

Eslah Arbabani, E. (2001). The book of Gilan (2nd ed.). Research Scholars of Iran Publications. (In Persian).

Ezzatollahi-Nejad, T. (2021). Capabilities of traditional arts in cultural management of society in contemporary times: A conversation with Seyyed Mohammad Beheshti. Research Index, 8(2), 9-28. (In Persian).

Gee, K., & Burkhard, B. (2010). Cultural ecosystem services in the context of offshore wind farming: A case study from the west coast of Schleswig-Holstein. Ecological Complexity, 7(3), 349-358. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecocom.2010.05.003

Ghahreman, A., & Attar, F. (2002). Anzali Lagoon on the verge of death (Ecological-floristic review). Environmental Studies, 28(30), 1-38. (In Persian).

Gorji Mahlabani, Y., & Daneshvar, K. (2010). Impact of climate on the formation of traditional architectural elements in Gilan. Armanshahr, 3(4), 135-146. (In Persian).

Hawkes, J. (2001). The fourth pillar of sustainability: Culture’s essential role in public planning. Common Ground.

Holmes, W. R. (1845). Sketches on the shores of the Caspian. R. Bentley.

Jones, K., Lanthier, Y., van der Voet, P., van Valkengoed, E., Taylor, D., & Fernández-Prieto, D. (2009). Monitoring and assessment of wetlands using Earth Observation: The GlobWetland project. Journal of Environmental Management, 90(7), 2154-2169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2007.07.031

Kasmaei, M. (2016). Climate and architecture (8th ed.). Khaak Publications. (In Persian).

Kenter, J. O., Hyde, T., Christie, M., & Fazey, I. (2011). The importance of deliberation in valuing ecosystem services in developing countries—Evidence from the Solomon Islands. Global Environmental Change, 21(2), 505-521. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.01.006

Khakpour, M. (2007). Architecture of Gilan houses. Ilia Publications. (In Persian).

Khakpour, M. (2019). Local rules governing the layout of rural residential areas in Gilan. Housing and Rural Environment, 38(166), 3-18. https://doi.org/10.22034/38.166.3 (In Persian).

Krejcie, R. V., & Morgan, D. W. (1970). Determining sample size for research activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30(3), 607-610. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316447003000308

Mahmoudi, M. (2005). Principles of sustainable design in line with sustainable development goals. (In Persian).

McKinley, T. (1997). Cultural indicators of development (No. 4). UNRISD Occasional Paper Series on Culture and Development.

Mehrdad, J. (2020). The role of climate, culture, and nature in the architecture of traditional houses in Gilan Province. Architectural Studies, 3(15), 90-97. (In Persian).

Memarian, G. (2010). Familiarity with Iranian residential architecture: Extroverted typology (5th ed.). Soroush Danesh Publications. (In Persian).

Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (MEA). (2005). Ecosystems and human well-being: Synthesis. Island Press.

Moghimnejad Hosseini, S. M., Maziyar, A., & Dadashi, I. (2023). The relationship between traditional arts and handicrafts from the perspective of traditionalists. Art Research, 12(24), 75-85. https://doi.org/20.1001.1.23453834.1401.12.24.8.9 (In Persian).

Nasr, S. H. (2010). Islamic art and spirituality (R. Ghasemian, Trans., 1st ed.). Hikmat Publications. (In Persian).

Nemat-Tavousi, M. (2012). Decoding parts of Iranian rain-seeking rituals. Iranian Studies, 11(21), 271-385. (In Persian).

Nikfetrat, M., & Beytaraf, E. (2016). Cultural influences in Iranian vernacular architecture from the perspective of sustainability. Shebak, 2(4 & 5), 126-134. (In Persian).

Norouzi, A., Monsef, A., & Nouri, N. (2023). Evaluating the impact of traditional architecture on rural sustainable development (Case study: Southwest of Isfahan Province). Geography and Environmental Planning, 34(4), 133-158. https://doi.org/10.22108/GEP.2023.136951.1574 (In Persian).

Quinn, W. W. (2015). The one tradition (R. Ghasemian, Trans., 1st ed.). Hikmat Publications. (In Persian).

Ravanbakhsh, M., & Bani-Asadi, S. (2010, May). The probable future of wetlands in millennium ecosystem scenarios. Paper presented at the First National Conference on Health, Environment, and Sustainable Development, Bandar Abbas, Iran. (In Persian).

Rokneddin Eftekhari, A., Hajipour, M., Fattahi, A., & Paydar Kolsang, A. (2012). Compatibility of new constructions in rural areas with traditional architecture and residents’ satisfaction (Case study: Central District of Delfan County). Housing and Rural Environment, 31(139), 85-98. (In Persian).

Shah-Hosseini, A., & Hajian-Farshani, Y. (2023). A comparative study of the art-industry of mat weaving in Gilan and Hormozgan provinces. Jalveh-ye Honar, 15(1), 24-42. https://doi.org/10.22051/JJH.2023.41866.1861 (In Persian).

Taheri, T. (2014). Traditional methods and folk culture of agriculture in Gilan (Rice and tea) (1st ed.). Ilia Publications. (In Persian).

Talaei, F., & Daryadel, E. (2015). Challenges of Anzali Lagoon and solutions within the framework of the Ramsar Convention. International Legal Journal, 32(52), 277-312. https://doi.org/10.22066/cilamag.2015.15766 (In Persian).

Vahabi, J., Gharishi, M. B., & Molaei Hashtjin, N. (2023). The role of water resource management in the economic development of plain villages in Central Gilan. Spatial Economics and Rural Development, 12(1), 91-210. (In Persian).

Verschuuren, B. (2007). Believing is seeing: Integrating cultural and spiritual values in conservation management.

Wu, J. (2013). Landscape sustainability science: Ecosystem services and human well-being in changing landscapes. Landscape Ecology, 28, 999-1023. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-013-9894-9

URL1: https://www.amar.org.ir/

URL2: https://www.amar.org.ir/

URL3: https://images.app.goo.gl/gxNzyuzz2HpBEG5x7

URL4: https://images.app.goo.gl/FEun7fPxUQefGQrcA

URL5: https://images.app.goo.gl/oVxE4E9chLERQexv5

URL6: https://images.app.goo.gl/vGBwywgqiaAcV2bJ9

URL7: https://images.app.goo.gl/rgkHQAqjN8J926ZB7

URL8: https://images.app.goo.gl/hvWTMifrKLLQdWmd8

URL9: https://images.app.goo.gl/QRJxua9GiWRqP8rx5

URL10: https://images.app.goo.gl/TY12AqNeJykvvJEX7

URL11: https://images.app.goo.gl/UsTXidKoJtmtCei4A

URL12: https://images.app.goo.gl/3rz3KJhy15jwcNQA7